Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Volume 48, Issue 5 , Pages 511-518, May 2009

Clinical Responses to Atomoxetine in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: The Integrated Data Exploratory Analysis (IDEA) Study

Dr. Newcorn is with the Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai School of Medicine; Dr. Weiss is with the Division of Child Psychiatry, University of British Columbia. Dr. Sutton is with i3 Research; Dr. Sumner is with Bio-behavioral Diagnostics Company

Accepted 8 January 2009.

Disclosure: Dr. Newcorn has received grants for research support from Eli Lilly and Ortho-McNeil-Janssen. He has been a consultant and/or advisor to Abbott, BioBehavioral Diagnostics, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen, Psychogenics, Sanofi-Aventis, and Shire, and a speaker for Ortho-McNeil-Janssen. Dr. Weiss has consulting, speaking, honoraria, and research funding from Eli Lilly, Shire, Janssen, and Purdue, as well as a consulting agreement with Takeda. Drs. Sutton and Sumner were with Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly & Company, when the study was performed.

Abstract 

Objectives

Clinical experience suggests that some (but not all) patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are highly responsive to the nonstimulant atomoxetine. We conducted a retrospective analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to identify potential baseline (moderator) and on-treatment (mediator) predictors of responses.

Method

Data from 6 U.S. RCTs among patients aged 6 to 18 years were pooled (N = 1,069; subjects treated with atomoxetine, n = 618). Subjects were categorized as much improved (≥40% decrease in ADHD Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator Administered and Scored total score), minimally improved (25%-<40% decline), or nonresponders (<25% decrease). Logistic regression, analyses of variance, and repeated-measures analyses were used to explore associations between baseline and on-treatment variables, achieving a much improved response at trial endpoint (6–9 weeks).

Results

Forty-seven percent of patients showed a much improved clinical response, and 40% did not respond. Only 13% of the patients had a minimal response. No baseline characteristics predicted achieving a much improved clinical response; the only predictor of achieving this response was being at least minimally improved by treatment week 4 (sensitivity = 81%, specificity = 72%, positive predictive value = 75%, and negative predictive value = 79%).

Conclusions

Clinical response to atomoxetine was bimodal, with most subjects being either responders who were much improved or nonresponders. There were no demographic or clinical predictors of response. However, subjects who ultimately achieved a much improved response were likely to be at least minimal responders by week 4. The recommendation to consider either augmenting or switching treatment in patients who do not achieve at least this level of response to atomoxetine by 4 weeks offers a method for limiting the extended duration of titration to subjects who are most likely to benefit further, while minimizing the duration of exposure in those less likely to achieve an excellent response.

Key Words:  atomoxetine , attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder , response prediction , mediator , moderator

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funding for this research was provided by Eli Lilly and Company.The authors thank Stephen W. Gutkin of Rete Biomedical Communications for assistance in manuscript preparation.Clinical trials registration information—Evaluation of Continuous Symptom Treatment of ADHD: A Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Assessment of Morning-Dosed or Evening-Dosed Strattera. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00486122. Results of the other studies analyzed in the Integrated Data Exploratory Analysis study are posted at www.clinicalstudyresults.org, ID numbers 5670, 7972, 2746, 1585, 1586, and 3468, and www.lillytrials.com.

PII: S0890-8567(09)60068-X

doi:10.1097/CHI.0b013e31819c55b2

Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Volume 48, Issue 5 , Pages 511-518, May 2009