Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Volume 48, Issue 7 , Pages 711-720, July 2009

Relative Cost-Effectiveness of Treatments for Adolescent Depression: 36-Week Results From the TADS Randomized Trial

Drs. Domino and Foster are with the School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Dr. Vitiello is with the National Institute of Mental Health; Dr. Kratochvil is with the University of Nebraska Medical Center; Dr. Burns is with the Duke University School of Medicine; Drs. Silva and March are with the Duke University Medical Center; and Dr. Reinecke is with Northwestern University

Accepted 19 February 2009.

Disclosure: Dr. Kratochvil has been a consultant or scientific advisor to Eli Lilly and Company, Shire, Cephalon, Organon, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Abbott Laboratories, and Pfizer; has received research support from Abbott Laboratories, Cephalon, Eli Lilly and Company, Forest Laboratories, GlaxoSmithKline, and Ortho-McNeil; has served on the speakers' bureau for Eli Lilly and Company; and has received study drug for an NIMH-funded study from Eli Lilly and Company. Dr. March has been a consultant or scientific advisor to Pfizer, Eli Lilly and Company, Wyeth, GlaxoSmithKline, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and MedAvante; has held stock in MedAvante; has received research support from Eli Lilly and Company and study drug for an NIMH-funded study from Eli Lilly and Company and Pfizer; and is the author of the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children. Dr. Silva has been a consultant to Pfizer. The other authors report no conflicts of interest.

Abstract 

Objective

The cost-effectiveness of three active interventions for major depression in adolescents was compared after 36 weeks of treatment in the Treatment of Adolescents with Depression Study.

Method

Outpatients aged 12 to 18 years with a primary diagnosis of major depression participated in a randomized controlled trial conducted at 13 U.S. academic and community clinics from 2000 to 2004. Three hundred twenty-seven participants randomized to 1 of 3 active treatment arms, fluoxetine alone (n = 109), cognitive-behavioral therapy (n = 111) alone, or their combination (n = 107), were evaluated for a 3-month acute treatment and a 6-month continuation/maintenance treatment period. Costs of services received for the 36 weeks were estimated and examined in relation to the number of depression-free days and quality-adjusted life-years. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were also generated. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess treatment differences on the quality-adjusted life-years and cost-effectiveness measures.

Results

Cognitive-behavioral therapy was the most costly treatment component (mean $1,787 [in monotherapy] and $1,833 [in combination therapy], median $1,923 [for both]). Reflecting higher direct and indirect costs associated with psychiatric hospital use, the costs of services received outside Treatment of Adolescents with Depression Study in fluoxetine-treated patients (mean $5,382, median $2,341) were significantly higher than those in participants treated with cognitive-behavioral therapy (mean $3,102, median $1,373) or combination (mean $2,705, median $927). Accordingly, cost-effectiveness acceptability curves indicate that combination treatment is highly likely (>90%) to be more cost-effective than fluoxetine alone at 36 weeks. Cognitive-behavioral therapy is not likely to be more cost-effective than fluoxetine.

Conclusions

These findings support the use of combination treatment in adolescents with depression over monotherapy. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry, 2009;48(7):711–720

Key Words:  depression , cost-effectiveness , cognitive-behavioral therapy , antidepressants. Clinical trial registration information—Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS). URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00006286

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was supported by contract N01 MH80008 from the National Institute of Mental Health to Duke University Medical Center (John S. March, Principal Investigator). Additional support was received by M.E.D. under K01-MH065639.Dr. Domino had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

PII: S0890-8567(09)60108-8

doi:10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181a2b319

Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Volume 48, Issue 7 , Pages 711-720, July 2009