Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Volume 47, Issue 1 , Pages 32-40, January 2008

Suicide Attempt Characteristics, Diagnoses, and Future Attempts: Comparing Multiple Attempters to Single Attempters and Ideators

Dr. Miranda is with the Department of Psychology, Hunter College, City University of New York; Drs. Miranda, Scott, and Shaffer, and Mr. Hicks and Ms. Munfakh are with the Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons; Dr. Wilcox is with the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Accepted 13 August 2007.

ABSTRACT 

Objective

To compare psychiatric diagnoses and future suicide attempt outcomes of multiple attempters (MAs), single attempters (SAs), and ideators.

Method

Two hundred twenty-eight teens who reported recent ideation or a lifetime suicide attempt in a screening of 1,729 high school students completed the Adolescent Suicide Interview, which provided information on attempt number and characteristics and mood, anxiety, and substance use disorder modules of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children; 191 were reinterviewed 4 to 6 years later to ascertain interval attempts and psychiatric disorder. Between screening and follow-up, 33 (17%) teens made an attempt, 12 of whom were previously classified as lifetime MAs (more than one attempt) and six as SAs.

Results

MAs more often met criteria for any one of the DSM diagnoses assessed at baseline (mood, anxiety, or substance use disorder; 71%), compared with SAs (39%) and ideators (41%), and at follow-up (mood, anxiety, substance use, or disruptive behavior disorder; 69%) compared with SAs (36%) (p <.05). As reported at baseline, MAs (versus SAs) more often wished to die during their attempt (53% versus 23%), less often planned their attempt for intervention (44% versus 76%), and more often regretted recovery (26% versus 7%; p <.05). Baseline MAs had significantly higher odds of making a later attempt compared to ideators (odds ratio 4.0, 95% confidence interval 1.5-10.2) and SAs (odds ratio 4.6, 95% confidence interval 1.0-20.2). No participants committed suicide during follow-up. SAs who made another attempt (versus those who did not) more often met criteria for a baseline anxiety disorder and more often wished to die during their baseline attempt.

Conclusions

MAs more strongly predict later suicidality and diagnosis than SAs and ideation. Forms that assess past suicide attempts should routinely inquire about frequency of attempts. The similarity between the present findings and those of clinical samples suggests that screening may yield a representative sample of suicide attempters and ideators. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry, 2008;47(1):32-40.

Key Words:  nonreferred suicide attempters , multiple attempters , suicidal intent , longitudinal

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Statistical analyses were conducted by Regina Miranda, Ph.D., with consultation from J. Blake Turner, Ph.D.

 Portions of this article were presented at the 53rd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, San Diego, October 24-29, 2006.

 This work was funded by grant R49/CCR 202598 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , NIMH grants P30 MH 43878 and ST32MH-16434 , and grants from the American Mental Health Foundation and the Carmel Hill Fund at Columbia University. The authors thank Madelyn Gould, Matthew Nock, Mark Olfson, J. Blake Turner, and Eva De Jaegere for comments on previous versions of this manuscript.

 Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

PII: S0890-8567(09)62082-7

doi:10.1097/chi.0b013e31815a56cb

Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Volume 47, Issue 1 , Pages 32-40, January 2008