Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Volume 46, Issue 6 , Pages 701-710, June 2007

Sex Differences in the Response of Children With ADHD to Once-Daily Formulations of Methylphenidate

Accepted 11 January 2007.

ABSTRACT 

Objectives

Studies of sex differences in methylphenidate response by children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder have lacked methodological rigor and statistical power. This paper reports an examination of sex differences based on further analysis of data from a comparison of two once-daily methylphenidate formulations (the COMACS study), which addresses these shortcomings.

Method

Children (184: 48 females; mean [SD]; age, 9.58 [1.83]; years) entered a double-blind, crossover trial of Concerta, MetadateCD/Equasym XL, or placebo. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms were recorded at seven time points across the school day on the seventh day of treatment, using a laboratory classroom setting.

Results

More females had comorbid anxiety disorder. Males and females did not differ with regard to other characteristics. Observed sex differences in pharmacodynamic symptom profiles persisted after controlling for placebo and time 0 hours attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder scores and the presence of an anxiety disorder. Females had a statistically superior response at 1.5 hours post-dosing and an inferior response at the 12-hour time point relative to their male counterparts, no matter which methylphenidate formulation was being assessed.

Conclusions

Dose titration of once-daily formulations of methylphenidate should ideally be based on systematic evidence of response at different periods across the day. The responses of female patients may require additional assessments later in the day to determine the optimal dose.

Key Words:  methylphenidate , response , sex differences

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was funded by Celltech Pharmaceuticals, Inc., now UCB Pharma.Disclosure: Dr. Sonuga-Barke and Mr. Coghill are consultants to or have received support from Celltech/UCB, Janssen Cilag, Shire, and Eli Lilly. Mr. Coghill has also received support from Cephalon. Dr. Swanson is a consultant to Celltech/UCB, McNeil, and Eli Lilly and has also received research support from and acted as a consultant to Cephalon, Shire, and Novartis. Mr. Hatch is a consultant to UCB. Dr. Vandenberghe is an employee of UCB. Dr. Markowitz has received support from Novartis Pharmaceuticals and Eli Lilly.

PII: S0890-8567(09)62149-3

doi:10.1097/chi.0b013e31804659f1

Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Volume 46, Issue 6 , Pages 701-710, June 2007