<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><channel rdf:about="http://www.jaacap.com//inpress?rss=yes"><title>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry - Articles in Press</title><description>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry RSS feed: Articles in Press.    
 
 
   Mission Statement 
 
Advancing the science of pediatric mental health and promoting the care 
of youth and their families. 
 
 Scope 
 
The  Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry  welcomes 
manuscripts from diverse viewpoints including but not limited to: genetic, epidemiological, neurobiological, psychopathological, cognitive, 
behavioral, and psychodynamic investigations.  The Journal also seeks to promote the well being of children and families by publishing 
scholarly papers on such subjects as health policy, legislation, advocacy, culture, and service provision as they pertain to the mental 
health of children and families.   </description><link>http://www.jaacap.com//inpress?rss=yes</link><dc:publisher>Elsevier Inc.</dc:publisher><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:rights> © 2011 American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </dc:rights><prism:publicationName>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry</prism:publicationName><prism:issn>0890-8567</prism:issn><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-03</prism:publicationDate><prism:copyright> © 2011 American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </prism:copyright><prism:rightsAgent>healthpermissions@elsevier.com</prism:rightsAgent><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856711011014/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856711011762/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856711011051/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856711011002/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856711010999/abstract?rss=yes"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856711011014/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Mental Health in Low-to-Moderate Risk Preterm, Low Birth Weight, and Small for Gestational Age Children at 4 to 5 Years: The Role of Early Maternal Parenting - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856711011014/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>
Objectives: 
The majority of children born preterm, with low birth weight, or small for gestational age are born with low-to-moderate risk (LTM), yet most research focuses on the high-risk group. Little is known about whether children with LTM perinatal risk are at greater risk for mental health problems, or what the role of early maternal parenting is in determining these outcomes.

Method: 
Longitudinal data were from a large nationally representative Australian cohort of 5,000 children, aged 0 to 1, 2 to 3, and 4 to 5 years of age. Participants were 354 children with LTM perinatal risk born at 33 to 36 weeks, with birth weight 1,501 to 2,499 grams, or born between the first and 10th percentiles for gestational age; and 2,461 children in the normal birth weight, term comparison group. Child mental health was measured by mother-report on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Parenting irritability, warmth, self-efficacy, maternal separation anxiety, and overprotective parenting were measured when children were 0 to 1 and 2 to 3 years of age.

Results: 
Parents in the LTM perinatal risk group were more likely to experience parenting difficulties on one of eight parenting measures (irritable parenting at age 0–1 year) when adjusting for socio-demographic differences (odds ratio = 1.43; 95% confidence interval = 1.05, 1.95, p &lt; .02). This group difference was no longer apparent by age 2 to 3 years. Compared with healthy-term peers, there were small increases in Emotional Symptoms and Total Difficulties on the SDQ for the LTM perinatal risk group at age 4 to 5 years. When accounting for maternal-specific and socio-demographic factors, LTM perinatal risk group continued to predict Emotional Symptoms but not Total Difficulties at age 4 to 5 years.

Conclusions: 
Children with LTM perinatal risk were at a small increased risk for emotional difficulties but did not differ significantly from other children of similar social backgrounds in their risk for generalized mental health problems. These findings support a biological and socio-economic, rather than parenting, pathway to psychological risk in children born with LTM perinatal risk.
</description><dc:title>Mental Health in Low-to-Moderate Risk Preterm, Low Birth Weight, and Small for Gestational Age Children at 4 to 5 Years: The Role of Early Maternal Parenting - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Elizabeth M. Westrupp, Fiona K. Mensah, Rebecca Giallo, Amanda Cooklin, Jan M. Nicholson</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jaac.2011.12.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-03</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-03</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>NEW RESEARCH</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856711011762/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Stress Reactivity and Corticolimbic Response to Emotional Faces in Adolescents - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856711011762/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>
Objective: 
Adolescence is a critical period in the development of lifelong patterns of responding to stress. Understanding underpinnings of variations in stress reactivity in adolescents is important, as adolescents with altered stress reactivity are vulnerable to negative risk-taking behaviors including substance use, and have increased lifelong risk for psychopathology. Although both endocrinological and corticolimbic neural system mechanisms are implicated in the development of stress reactivity patterns, the roles of these systems and interactions between the systems in reactivity to social stimuli in adolescents are not clear. We investigated the relationship between cortisol response to a laboratory-based social stressor and regional brain responses to emotional face stimuli in adolescents.

Method: 
Changes in cortisol levels following the Trier Social Stress Test—Child version (TSST-C) were measured in 23 disadvantaged and chronically stressed adolescents who also participated in functional magnetic resonance imaging during processing of emotional faces and structural magnetic resonance imaging. The relationships between changes in cortisol following the TSST-C with regional brain activation during face processing, as well as with regional brain morphology, were assessed.

Results: 
Cortisol change on the TSST-C showed a significant inverse relationship with left hippocampus response to fearful faces (p &lt; .05, corrected); significant associations with volume were not observed.

Conclusions: 
Increased cortisol response to the Trier social stressor was associated with diminished response of the left hippocampus to faces depicting fear. This suggests that HPA–corticolimbic system mechanisms may underlie vulnerability to maladaptive responses to stress in adolescents that may contribute to development of stress-related disorders.
</description><dc:title>Stress Reactivity and Corticolimbic Response to Emotional Faces in Adolescents - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Jie Liu, Tara M. Chaplin, Fei Wang, Rajita Sinha, Linda C. Mayes, Hilary P. Blumberg</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jaac.2011.12.014</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-03</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-03</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>NEW RESEARCH</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856711011051/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Amygdala Hyperactivation During Face Emotion Processing in Unaffected Youth at Risk for Bipolar Disorder - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856711011051/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>
Objective: 
Youth at familial risk for bipolar disorder (BD) show deficits in face emotion processing, but the neural correlates of these deficits have not been examined. This preliminary study tests the hypothesis that, relative to healthy comparison (HC) subjects, both BD subjects and youth at risk for BD (i.e., those with a first-degree BD relative) will demonstrate amygdala hyperactivation when viewing fearful and happy faces. The at-risk youth were unaffected, in that they had no history of mood disorder.

Method: 
Amygdala activity was examined in 101 unrelated participants, 8 to 18 years old. Age, gender, and IQ-matched groups included BD (N = 32), unaffected at-risk (N = 13), and HC (N = 56). During functional magnetic resonance imaging, participants attended to emotional and nonemotional aspects of fearful and happy faces.

Results: 
While rating their fear of fearful faces, both BD and unaffected at-risk subjects exhibited amygdala hyperactivity versus HC. There were no between-group differences in amygdala activity in response to happy faces. Post-hoc comparisons revealed that, in at-risk youth, familial risk status (offspring versus sibling), presence of Axis I diagnosis (n = 1 attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [ADHD], n = 1 social phobia), and history of medication exposure (n = 1) did not influence imaging findings.

Conclusions: 
We found amygdala hyperactivation in both unaffected at-risk and BD youth while rating their fear of fearful faces. These pilot data suggest that both face emotion labeling deficits and amygdala hyperactivity during face processing should receive further study as potential BD endophenotypes. Longitudinal studies should test whether amygdala hyperactivity to fearful faces predicts conversion to BD in at-risk youth.
</description><dc:title>Amygdala Hyperactivation During Face Emotion Processing in Unaffected Youth at Risk for Bipolar Disorder - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Aviva K. Olsavsky, Melissa A. Brotman, Julia G. Rutenberg, Eli J. Muhrer, Christen M. Deveney, Stephen J. Fromm, Kenneth Towbin, Daniel S. Pine, Ellen Leibenluft</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jaac.2011.12.008</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-02-02</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-02-02</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>NEW RESEARCH</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856711011002/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Aftercare, Emergency Department Visits, and Readmission in Adolescents - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856711011002/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>
Objective: 
U.S. and Canadian data demonstrate decreasing inpatient days, increasing nonurgent emergency department (ED) visits, and short supply of child psychiatrists. Our study aims to determine whether aftercare reduces ED visits and/or readmission in adolescents with first psychiatric hospitalization.

Method: 
We conducted a population-based cohort analysis using linked health administrative databases with accrual from April 1, 2002, to March 1, 2004. The study cohort included all 15- to 19-year-old adolescents with first psychiatric admission. Adolescents with and without aftercare in the month post-discharge were matched on their propensity to receive aftercare. Our primary outcome was time to first psychiatric ED visit or readmission. Secondary outcomes were time to first psychiatric ED visit and readmission, separately.

Results: 
We identified 4,472 adolescents with first-time psychiatric admission. Of these, 57% had aftercare in the month post-discharge. Propensity-score–based matching, which accounted for each individual's propensity for aftercare, produced a cohort of 3,004 adolescents. In matched analyses, relative to those with no aftercare in the month post-discharge, those with aftercare had increased likelihood of combined outcome (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05–1.42), and readmission (HR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.14–1.66), but not ED visits (HR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.95–1.37).

Conclusions: 
Our results are provocative: we found that aftercare in the month post-discharge increased the likelihood of readmission but not ED visit. Over and above confounding by severity and Canadian/U.S. systems differences, our results may indicate a relative lack of psychiatric services for youth. Our results point to the need for improved data capture of pediatric mental health service use.
</description><dc:title>Aftercare, Emergency Department Visits, and Readmission in Adolescents - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Corine E. Carlisle, Muhammad Mamdani, Russell Schachar, Teresa To</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jaac.2011.12.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-01-27</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-01-27</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>NEW RESEARCH</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856711010999/abstract?rss=yes"><title>A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Cool Teens CD-ROM Computerized Program for Adolescent Anxiety - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856711010999/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>
Objective: 
Computerized cognitive behavioral interventions for anxiety disorders in adults have been shown to be efficacious, but limited data are available on the use of computerized interventions with young persons. Adolescents in particular are difficult to engage in treatment and may be especially suited to computerized technologies. This paper describes the results of a small randomized controlled trial of the Cool Teens program for adolescent anxiety, and examines potential barriers to treatment and user preferences of computerized technology in this population.

Method: 
Forty-three adolescents with a primary diagnosis of anxiety were randomly allocated to the Cool Teens program, a 12-week computerized cognitive-behavioral therapy program for anxiety management, or a 12-week wait list. Effects on symptoms, negative thoughts, and life interference were assessed at post-treatment and 3-month follow-up, based on diagnosis as well as self and maternal report.

Results: 
Using mixed-model analyses, at post-treatment and follow-up assessments, adolescents in the Cool Teens condition, compared with those on the wait list, were found to have significant reductions in the total number of anxiety disorders, the severity of the primary anxiety disorder, and the average severity for all disorders. These results were matched by significant reductions in mother and child questionnaire reports of anxiety, internalizing symptoms, automatic thoughts, and life interference. Further few barriers to treatment were found, and user preferences indicated that the computerized treatment was well suited to adolescents with anxiety.

Conclusions: 
The Cool Teens program is efficacious for treatment of adolescent anxiety.
Clinical trial registration information—A randomized controlled trial of the Cool Teens computerized program for anxious adolescents compared with waist list; http://www.anzctr.org.au; ACTRN12611000508976.
</description><dc:title>A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Cool Teens CD-ROM Computerized Program for Adolescent Anxiety - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Viviana M. Wuthrich, Ronald M. Rapee, Michael J. Cunningham, Heidi J. Lyneham, Jennifer L. Hudson, Carolyn A. Schniering</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jaac.2011.12.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-01-24</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-01-24</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>NEW RESEARCH</prism:section></item></rdf:RDF>
