<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><channel rdf:about="http://www.jaacap.com//inpress?rss=yes"><title>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry - Articles in Press</title><description>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry RSS feed: Articles in Press. 
 Mission Statement 
 
Advancing the science of pediatric mental health and promoting the care of youth and their families.

 
 
 Scope 
 
The  Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry  welcomes manuscripts from diverse 
viewpoints including but not limited to: genetic, epidemiological, neurobiological, psychopathological, cognitive, behavioral, and psychodynamic 
investigations.  The Journal also seeks to promote the well being of children and families by publishing scholarly papers on such subjects 
as health policy, legislation, advocacy, culture, and service provision as they pertain to the mental health of children and families.</description><link>http://www.jaacap.com//inpress?rss=yes</link><dc:publisher>Elsevier Inc.</dc:publisher><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:rights> © 2010 American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </dc:rights><prism:publicationName>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry</prism:publicationName><prism:issn>0890-8567</prism:issn><prism:publicationDate>2010-09-07</prism:publicationDate><prism:copyright> © 2010 American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </prism:copyright><prism:rightsAgent>healthpermissions@elsevier.com</prism:rightsAgent><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856710004971/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856710004983/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856710005903/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856710005228/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856710005575/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856710005617/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856710004764/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856710004946/abstract?rss=yes"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856710004971/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Trends in Serious Emotional Disturbance Among Youths Exposed to Hurricane Katrina - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856710004971/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Objective:: To examine patterns and predictors of trends in DSM-IV serious emotional disturbance (SED) among youths exposed to Hurricane Katrina.Method: A probability sample of adult pre-hurricane residents of the areas affected by Katrina completed baseline and follow-up telephone surveys 18 to 27 months post-hurricane and 12 to 18 months later. Baseline adult respondents residing with children and adolescents (4-17 years of age) provided informant reports about the emotional functioning of these youths (n = 576) with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). The surveys also assessed hurricane-related stressors and ongoing stressors experienced by respondent families.Results: SED prevalence decreased significantly across survey waves from 15.1% to 11.5%, although even the latter prevalence was considerably higher than the pre-hurricane prevalence of 4.2% estimated in the US National Health Interview Survey. Trends in hurricane-related SED were predicted by both stressors experienced in the hurricane and ongoing stressors, with SED prevalence decreasing significantly only among youths with moderate stress exposure (16.8% versus 6.5%). SED prevalence did not change significantly between waves among youths with either high stress exposure (30.0% versus 41.9%) or low stress exposure (3.5% versus 3.4%). Pre-hurricane functioning did not predict SED persistence among youths with high stress exposure, but did predict SED persistence among youth with low-moderate stress exposure.Conclusions: The prevalence of SED among youths exposed to Hurricane Katrina remains significantly elevated several years after the storm despite meaningful decrease since baseline. Youths with high stress exposure have the highest risk of long-term hurricane-related SED and consequently represent an important target for mental health intervention.</description><dc:title>Trends in Serious Emotional Disturbance Among Youths Exposed to Hurricane Katrina - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Katie A. McLaughlin, John A. Fairbank, Michael J. Gruber, Russell T. Jones, Joy D. Osofsky, Betty Pfefferbaum, Nancy A. Sampson, Ronald C. Kessler</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jaac.2010.06.012</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-09-07</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-09-07</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>NEW RESEARCH</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856710004983/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Predictors and Moderators of Treatment Outcome in the Pediatric Obsessive Compulsive Treatment Study (POTS I) - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856710004983/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Objective:: To identify predictors and moderators of outcome in the first Pediatric OCD Treatment Study (POTS I) among youth (N = 112) randomly assigned to sertraline, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), both sertraline and CBT (COMB), or a pill placebo.Method:: Potential baseline predictors and moderators were identified by literature review. The outcome measure was an adjusted week 12 predicted score for the Children's Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS). Main and interactive effects of treatment condition and each candidate predictor or moderator variable were examined using a general linear model on the adjusted predicted week 12 CY-BOCS scores.Results:: Youth with lower obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) severity, less OCD-related functional impairment, greater insight, fewer comorbid externalizing symptoms, and lower levels of family accommodation showed greater improvement across treatment conditions than their counterparts after acute POTS treatment. Those with a family history of OCD had more than a sixfold decrease in effect size in CBT monotherapy relative to their counterparts in CBT without a family history of OCD.Conclusions:: Greater attention is needed to build optimized intervention strategies for more complex youth with OCD. Youth with a family history of OCD are not likely to benefit from CBT unless offered in combination with an SSRI.Clinical Trials Registration Information –: Treatment of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) in Children, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00000384.</description><dc:title>Predictors and Moderators of Treatment Outcome in the Pediatric Obsessive Compulsive Treatment Study (POTS I) - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Abbe Marrs Garcia, Jeffrey J. Sapyta, Phoebe S. Moore, Jennifer B. Freeman, Martin E. Franklin, John S. March, Edna B. Foa</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jaac.2010.06.013</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-09-07</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-09-07</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>NEW RESEARCH</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856710005903/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Prolonged Exposure versus Dynamic Therapy for Adolescent PTSD: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856710005903/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Objective:: To examine the efficacy and maintenance of developmentally adapted prolonged exposure therapy for adolescents (PE-A) compared with active control time-limited dynamic therapy (TLDP-A) for decreasing posttraumatic and depressive symptoms in adolescent victims of single-event traumas.Method:: Thirty-eight adolescents (12 to 18 years old) were randomly assigned to receive PE-A or TLDP-A.Results:: Both treatments resulted in decreased posttraumatic stress disorder and depression and increased functioning. PE-A exhibited a greater decrease of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression symptom severity and a greater increase in global functioning than did TDLP-A. After treatment, 68.4% of adolescents beginning treatment with PE-A and 36.8% of those beginning treatment with TLDP-A no longer met diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder. Treatment gains were maintained at 6- and 17-month follow-ups.Conclusions:: Brief individual therapy is effective in decreasing posttraumatic distress and behavioral trauma-focused components enhance efficacy.Clinical trial registry information—Prolonged Exposure Therapy Versus Active Psychotherapy in Treating Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Adolescents, URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov, unique identifier: NCT00183690.</description><dc:title>Prolonged Exposure versus Dynamic Therapy for Adolescent PTSD: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Eva Gilboa-Schechtman, Edna Foa, Naama Shafran, Idan M. Aderka, Mark B. Powers, Lilach Rachamim, Lea Rosenbach, Elna Yadin, Alan Apter</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jaac.2010.07.014</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-09-07</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-09-07</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>NEW RESEARCH</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856710005228/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine Enhance Prefrontal Function Through α2-Adrenergic and Dopamine D1 Receptors - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856710005228/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Objective:: This study examined the effects of the attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder treatments, methylphenidate (MPH) and atomoxetine (ATM), on prefrontal cortex (PFC) function in monkeys and explored the receptor mechanisms underlying enhancement of PFC function at the behavioral and cellular levels.Method:: Monkeys performed a working memory task after administration of a wide range of MPH or ATM doses. The optimal doses were challenged with the α2-adrenoceptor antagonist, idazoxan, or the D1 dopamine receptor antagonist, SCH23390 (SCH). In a parallel physiology study, neurons were recorded from the dorsolateral PFC of a monkey performing a working memory task. ATM, SCH, or the α2 antagonist, yohimbine, were applied to the neurons by iontophoresis.Results:: MPH and ATM generally produced inverted-U dose-response curves, with improvement occurring at moderate doses, but not at higher doses. The beneficial effects of these drugs were blocked by idazoxan or SCH. At the cellular level, ATM produced an inverted-U dose-response effect on memory-related firing, enhancing firing for preferred directions (increasing “signals”) and decreasing firing for the nonpreferred directions (decreasing “noise”). The increase in persistent firing for the preferred direction was blocked by yohimbine, whereas the suppression of firing for the nonpreferred directions was blocked by SCH.Conclusions:: Optimal doses of MPH or ATM improved PFC cognitive function in monkeys. These enhancing effects appeared to involve indirect stimulation of α2 adrenoceptors and D1 dopamine receptors in the PFC. These receptor actions likely contribute to their therapeutic effects in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.</description><dc:title>Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine Enhance Prefrontal Function Through α2-Adrenergic and Dopamine D1 Receptors - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Nao J. Gamo, Min Wang, Amy F.T. Arnsten</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jaac.2010.06.015</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-09-02</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-09-02</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>NEW RESEARCH</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856710005575/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Infant Brain Development and Vulnerability to Later Internalizing Difficulties: The Generation R Study - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856710005575/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Objective:: Although clinical studies have demonstrated smaller subcortical volumes in structures such as the amygdala, hippocampus, caudate nucleus, and thalamus in adults and adolescents with depressive disorders and anxiety, no study has assessed such structures in babies, long before the development of the disorders. This study examined whether the size of the “gangliothalamic ovoid” (encompassing the basal ganglia and thalamus) assessed during infancy is associated with increased internalizing problems in early childhood.Method:: Cranial ultrasounds were used to assess gangliothalamic ovoid diameter and ventricular volume at 6 weeks of postnatal age; moreover, head circumference was measured. Outcome data included ratings of internalizing and externalizing problems using the Child Behavior Checklist (reported by mothers and fathers) at 18 and/or 36 months. Analyses were based on a total of 651 children.Results:: Smaller gangliothalamic diameter was associated with higher Child Behavior Checklist Internalizing scores at ages 18 and 36 months. Results remained significant after correcting for head circumference and were evident for the DSM-oriented subscales of anxiety problems and affective problems. Total ventricular volume was not consistently associated with Internalizing scores.Conclusions:: Findings associating infant brain measurements with Child Behavior Checklist mother and father reports at two time points are consistent with previous cross-sectional reports of smaller subcortical volumes in depression. Results were not simply reflective of overall brain development, because the pattern held after adjustment for head circumference. This is the first study to point toward a biological vulnerability evident in infancy, involved in the development of internalizing problems in childhood.</description><dc:title>Infant Brain Development and Vulnerability to Later Internalizing Difficulties: The Generation R Study - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Catherine M. Herba, Sabine J. Roza, Paul Govaert, Joram van Rossum, Albert Hofman, Vincent Jaddoe, Frank C. Verhulst, Henning Tiemeier</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jaac.2010.07.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-09-02</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-09-02</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>NEW RESEARCH</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856710005617/abstract?rss=yes"><title>National Trends in Child and Adolescent Psychotropic Polypharmacy in Office-Based Practice, 1996-2007 - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856710005617/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Objective:: To examine patterns and recent trends in multiclass psychotropic treatment among youth visits to office-based physicians in the United States.Method:: Annual data from the 1996-2007 National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys were analyzed to examine patterns and trends in multiclass psychotropic treatment within a nationally representative sample of 3,466 child and adolescent visits to office-based physicians in which a psychotropic medication was prescribed.Results:: There was an increase in the percentage of child visits in which psychotropic medications were prescribed that included at least two psychotropic classes. Across the 12 year period, multiclass psychotropic treatment rose from 14.3% of child psychotropic visits (1996-1999) to 20.2% (2004-2007) (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.22-2.94, p &lt; .01). Among medical visits in which a current mental disorder was diagnosed, the percentage with multiclass psychotropic treatment increased from 22.2% (1996-1999) to 32.2% (2004-2007) (AOR = 2.23, 95% CI = 1.42-3.52, p &lt; .001). Over time, there were significant increases in multiclass psychotropic visits in which ADHD medications, antidepressants, or antipsychotics were prescribed, and a decrease in those visits in which mood stabilizers were prescribed. There were also specific increases in co-prescription of ADHD medications and antipsychotic medications (AOR = 6.22, 95% CI = 2.82-13.70, p &lt; .001) and co-prescription of antidepressant and antipsychotic medications (AOR = 5.77, 95% CI = 2.88-11.60, p &lt; .001).Conclusions:: Although little is known about the safety and efficacy of regimens that involve concomitant use of two or more psychotropic agents for children and adolescents, multiclass psychotropic pharmacy is becoming increasingly common in outpatient practice.</description><dc:title>National Trends in Child and Adolescent Psychotropic Polypharmacy in Office-Based Practice, 1996-2007 - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Jonathan S. Comer, Mark Olfson, Ramin Mojtabai</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jaac.2010.07.007</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-09-02</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-09-02</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>NEW RESEARCH</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856710004764/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Lifetime Prevalence of Mental Disorders in U.S. Adolescents: Results from the National Comorbidity Study–Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A) - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856710004764/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Objective: To present estimates of the lifetime prevalence of DSM-IV mental disorders with and without severe impairment, their comorbidity across broad classes of disorder, and their sociodemographic correlates.Method: The National Comorbidity Survey–Adolescent Supplement NCS-A is a nationally representative face-to-face survey of 10,123 adolescents aged 13 to 18 years in the continental United States. DSM-IV mental disorders were assessed using a modified version of the fully structured World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview.Results: Anxiety disorders were the most common condition (31.9%), followed by behavior disorders (19.1%), mood disorders (14.3%), and substance use disorders (11.4%), with approximately 40% of participants with one class of disorder also meeting criteria for another class of lifetime disorder. The overall prevalence of disorders with severe impairment and/or distress was 22.2% (11.2% with mood disorders, 8.3% with anxiety disorders, and 9.6% behavior disorders). The median age of onset for disorder classes was earliest for anxiety (6 years), followed by 11 years for behavior, 13 years for mood, and 15 years for substance use disorders.Conclusions: These findings provide the first prevalence data on a broad range of mental disorders in a nationally representative sample of U.S. adolescents. Approximately one in every four to five youth in the U.S. meets criteria for a mental disorder with severe impairment across their lifetime. The likelihood that common mental disorders in adults first emerge in childhood and adolescence highlights the need for a transition from the common focus on treatment of U.S. youth to that of prevention and early intervention.</description><dc:title>Lifetime Prevalence of Mental Disorders in U.S. Adolescents: Results from the National Comorbidity Study–Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A) - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Kathleen Ries Merikangas, Jian-ping He, Marcy Burstein, Sonja A. Swanson, Shelli Avenevoli, Lihong Cui, Corina Benjet, Katholiki Georgiades, Joel Swendsen</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jaac.2010.05.017</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-08-02</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-08-02</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>NEW RESEARCH</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856710004946/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Does Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Youth Anxiety Outperform Usual Care in Community Clinics? An Initial Effectiveness Test - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.jaacap.com/article/PIIS0890856710004946/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Objective: Most tests of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for youth anxiety disorders have shown beneficial effects, but these have been efficacy trials with recruited youths treated by researcher-employed therapists. One previous (nonrandomized) trial in community clinics found that CBT did not outperform usual care (UC). The present study used a more stringent effectiveness design to test CBT versus UC in youths referred to community clinics, with all treatment provided by therapists employed in the clinics.Method: A randomized controlled trial methodology was used. Therapists were randomized to training and supervision in the Coping Cat CBT program or UC. Forty-eight youths (56% girls, 8 to 15 years of age, 38% Caucasian, 33% Latino, 15% African-American) diagnosed with DSM-IV anxiety disorders were randomized to CBT or UC.Results: At the end of treatment more than half the youths no longer met criteria for their primary anxiety disorder, but the groups did not differ significantly on symptom (e.g., parent report, eta-square = 0.0001; child report, eta-square = 0.09; both differences favoring UC ) or diagnostic (CBT, 66.7% without primary diagnosis; UC, 73.7%; odds ratio 0.71) outcomes. No differences were found with regard to outcomes of comorbid conditions, treatment duration, or costs. However, youths receiving CBT used fewer additional services than UC youths (χ21 = 8.82, p = .006).Conclusions: CBT did not produce better clinical outcomes than usual community clinic care. This initial test involved a relatively modest sample size; more research is needed to clarify whether there are conditions under which CBT can produce better clinical outcomes than usual clinical care.Clinical trial registry information—Community Clinic Test of Youth Anxiety and Depression Study, URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov, unique identifier: NCT01005836.</description><dc:title>Does Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Youth Anxiety Outperform Usual Care in Community Clinics? An Initial Effectiveness Test - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Michael A. Southam-Gerow, John R. Weisz, Brian C. Chu, Bryce D. McLeod, Elana B. Gordis, Jennifer K. Connor-Smith</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jaac.2010.06.009</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-08-02</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-08-02</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>NEW RESEARCH</prism:section></item></rdf:RDF>